Thought Leadership

Tradition Vs Technology: Do letters of credit have a future in a post-COVID-19 world?

Written by Brian Edmondson
Tradition Vs Technology: Do letters of credit have a future in a post-COVID-19 world?

An interview with Brian Edmondson  

Tradition versus technology: Do letters of credit have a future in a post-COVID-19 world?

The recent pandemic has accelerated the digitization process which had been creeping forward in recent years. Some people see the move to digital trade finance as opening Pandora’s Box; will this change lead to inefficiencies, and will there be unexpected risks to deal with? 

Yet, some see digitization as letting the genie out of the bottle and believe that the advantages will come very quickly. 

Letters of credit are an important instrument of traditional trade finance. They are characterised by a heavily manual, paper-based process and can be an expensive outlay for corporates. 

In part of a recent survey conducted by Finastra, 83% of banks that we asked said that letters of credit were ready for change. This is because, while they provide supreme confidence and low levels of failure for banks and businesses, they are expensive and cumbersome instruments. 

Adapting to change

The key issue that banks faced during the pandemic, initially, was that corporate clients and bank operations staff had to work remotely. The years of moving paper and customers walking into branches could happen. Banks had to adapt and move some importance away from paper-based documents. They had to digitize a lot of these elements. 

The other adaption was the drive for corporates to move towards using digital channels as a way of communicating with banks. We have seen a growth of the multi-bank platforms such as Marco Polo and Contour – the later of which has seen a 60% increase in business. 

Lastly, out of necessity, banks have acted like couriers where there was an absolute need to move physical paper. They have been helped customers to understand where to send physical paper documents, how to do this quickly and how to move paper between institutions as well. 

There is potential to evolve letters of credit and reap the benefits

In the past, the manual intervention and physical movement of paper has led to letters of credit remaining relatively expensive. Trade finance suffers from an inertia which has blocked a digital revolution. But the recent necessity to alter these manual processes has lifted the curtain on some of the mysteries of trade finance; paving the way for change. 

The benefits of digitizing trade revolve not only around reducing cost, but also increasing efficiencies, reducing time taken to implement trade and, crucially; increasing the availability of trade finance. 

For example, if letters of credit are implemented digitally, we would see these instruments becoming accessible to more SMEs. We will see the distinctions between letters of credit and open account become more blurred, where letters of credit will become a much quicker process, while using open account in trade finance will require more guarantees that payment will be made. 

Regional banks will be able to utilise letters of credit more easily, too, and expand upon their own business due to the increased availability of technology which can help with their operational efficiencies. 

Stumbling blocks to digitizing letters of credit

In our recent survey, banks told us that they were waiting to see what the industry did before investing in a change. There were also some concerns from banks about their expertise surrounding the digitalization of letters of credit. Of course, this is rapidly changing in response to the recent pandemic. 

However, the technology is mature enough and there are a number of secure solutions in the market already. The main blocker really is an inertia in the banking world to adopt this new technology. 

There are always some risks involved when you implement a new tool, process or piece of technology. Whether that investment will prove to be effective is always the question. 

But, what are the risks of not investing and continuing to move paper manually? Comparatively, they are huge. 

These manual processes hold opportunities for human areas at multiple steps when implementing letters of credit. On balance, it is difficult to compare the digital process with the manual process and say that the risk of sticking with traditional letters of credit isn’t greater than the risk of going digital. If anything, the risk of using digital letters of credit will fall over time. 

What needs to happen to implement digital letters of credit? 

Digitizing the documents that make up trade finance is, of course, crucial. 80% of people looking into digitizing trade would put the bill of lading as the most important instrument to digitize. There are other important documents as well; promissory notes and bills of exchange, to name a couple. 

As documents are digitized and standards are built up, the compliance assuredness will follow in line with the build up of best practices. DSI is one of the front-runners in terms of standardising the data between parties and jurisdictions which are involved in the letters of credit process. 

Across different countries, different governments are working at varying pace to help with the regulation and digitization of documents for trade finance. However, the trend shows an increase in the support for digital trade from governments and steps being taken towards regulatory change.

Written by